THE EYE OF PROVIDENCE

Unifying Gravity with Electromagnetism


Albert Einstein is credited with having unified the force of gravity with the electro-magnetic force, but this is not entirely accurate. While he did manage to prove that gravity bends light (space-time) around heavy objects, he was unable to account for what gives these objects their mass, in the first place. The current theory suggests that there is an energy field (the Higgs Field) which perturbs the motion of particles through space and time, slowing them down and making them massive. The discovery of the Higgs Boson will allow physicists to fully unify gravity and electro-magnetism together with the weak and strong interactive forces. In short, it will supply the necessary ingredient towards a Grand Unified Theory of everything.


In this post, I would like to present my working theory of how gravity and electro-magnetism arise out of the Higgs Field with the use of interactive visual displays. In the case of a large body, like the Earth, motion through the Higgs Field creates its mass, which in turn creates its gravity well. I submit that the interaction between the resulting gravity well and the Higgs Field goes on to produce the electro-magnetic field around the Earth. This occurs in two ways, one for the electrical force, and another for the magnetic. I will focus on the magnetic force first.

The Earth's gravity field can be represented as a series of lines (world lines) converging on a single point. Actually it is a bit more complicated then that, but the above illustration will help to serve the point.


As we know from the last post, the Higgs Field can be depicted as a series of horizontal lines that exist across space and time. By the same token, the rasterized pixels on your computer screen can be seen to represent the omnipresent Higgs field. As you scroll up and down through this page, notice how the radial lines of the image interact with the horizontal/rasterised lines of your computer screen to create a moire pattern that embodies the characteristic field lines of the magnetic field. The faster you move it the more pronounced are these seeming field lines. I propose that what you are seeing is an accurate simulation of how a gravitational field would behave whilst moving with respect to the Higgs Field. Try it again with this image.

Now click on a non-responsive part of your browsers and move it side to side across you computer screen. This will help you to see the effect more clearly. Moving the browser window in wide circles shows a rotating moire pattern. The tighter the circles become the less intense the field and the more disorganised the pattern appears.


Physics is all about finding underlying causes to the fundamental forces, and this is exactly what I am doing here. If this visual effect can seriously be considered to form an underlying cause to the creation of the Earth's magnetic field, then we can proffer a number of statements about the production and behavior of the field itself:


Firstly, the field can be said to be produced by the interaction of the hyperbolic curvature of gravity with the holographic grating of the Higgs Field, which – as I explained in the last post – is intrinsically linked with time. This suggests some kind of closed feedback loop, where the energy of any truly large object (e.g. the Earth) is converted into mass via its interaction with the Higgs Field; which in turn produces a gravity field that reciprocates with the Higgs Field to produce the magnetic field of the Earth.


Secondly, continuous observations of the Earth's magnetic field reveal it to be moving. This motion has been accelerating in recent years, and scientist assume that this means that a pole shift is underway. However, they do not claim to understand what drives these periodic shifts in the orientation of the magnetic field. The above interactive displays would suggest that these magnetic flips are due to the relative motion of the Earth's gravity field with respect to the Higgs Field. Also the strength of the magnetic field is dependent on how fast it is moving with respect to this field.
0
Thirdly, if gravity is capable of producing an electro-magnetic field around the Earth, in conjunction with the Higgs Field (which is analogous to space-time) then gravity must be electric in nature. Why? For the simple reason that the only thing that gives rise to a magnetic field is an electric one. This should be of no surprise to us as Einstein already proved a link between gravity and the electromagnetic forces, nearly 100 years ago.
0
Einstein realised that gravity had the ability to slow down  time, and that this effect was subject to the strength of the field. Gravity is always strongest on the surface of a any object (like the Earth) with its strength trailing off the further you travel from the Earth and self-negating at the core of the planet. Thus time flows faster in the upper atmosphere and in the core than it does at sea level. I propose that these time differentials between the different areas of the Earth's gravitic field, as it rotates, produce an electro-kinetic charge differential.


There are a number of reasons why this might occur. The first one is intuitive, suggesting that the energy differentials of different areas of rotating space and time interacting with one another produce charges which are then as much the creation of the temporal sphere as they are of the physical processes of the three spacial dimensions. A practical consideration might be that the relativistic effect of time contraction may give electrically charged bodies in the upper atmosphere (for example) more time to act upon the lower levels where time moves more slowly.


As a visual aid to the above concepts, take a look at this informative video on how the dots operate on a DJ's turntable operate.
0

The modular periodicy of the dots create a laterally expanding pattern when under rotation. When the pitch fader is at zero location the row of big dots appears to be stationary. However, above and below it the dots are moving off in opposite directions. This is similar to the way that time passes slower on the Earth's surface and quicker above and below it. The strobe light can be thought of as analogous to the flicker-rate of the holographic grating of the Higgs Field (see last post).

We can think of gravity as an electro-kinetic force created out of the energy differentials of curved space time. This goes a long way to explain such electrical atmospheric phenomena, such as sprites, as well as the fly-by anomaly observed by research satellites in recent decades.
o

Knowledge of gravity's relationship to electricity has been known about for sometime. In particular the work of T.T. Brown, who coined the phrase electro-gravitics to explain the unnatural ability of electricity to defy the power of gravity (see Lifter Technology). For those who do not believe that lifters can defy gravity, I present this video of a lifter in a vacuum chamber at NASA. For those who are skeptical about the idea that gravity is related in anyway to electricity I urge you to consider that the object of the Grand Unified Field Theory is to show that these, and all other forces, are all aspects of the one force.

This concludes my presentation of the Unification of Gravity with Electromagnetics.

HOLOGRAPHIC TIME GRATING

The Large Hadron Collider is getting closer and closer to its stated aim; finding the Higgs Boson. The Higgs is a particle which acts as an exciter to the proposed Higgs field, and thusly gives mass to matter. The main determinant in an objects mass is the amount of energy the object is divested of. However, this energy is only really converted into mass in the presence of the Higg's field.

The blue/green zig-zag line depicts the path

of a particle as it moves through the omni-

present Higgs Field. The straight green line

shows a different particle moving at the speed

of light, and therefore avoiding the Higgs Field

altogether.

The green/blue zig-zag line is the path of a particle that is stationary – i.e. moving with respect to time (the vertical axis) only. It will keep bumping into the field lines (black lines) of the Higgs Field because it is traveling in an over-all perpendicular trajectory to said field lines. A particle that is traveling at the speed of light (on the other hand) warps space-time according to the Lorentz contraction thereby moving in a diagonal trajectory. This means it avoids the field lines altogether and therefore has no mass and shed loads of energy.Time does not pass for it, it travels in space only. 


The particle which encounters the Higg's field has its energy divided by the speed of light squared, as per Einstein's famous equation E=mc^2. This means that its large energy value is divided by an almost equally large constant, giving rise to a relatively small amount of mass.

The Higg's field is described as omnipresent, which means that it exists everywhere in space and time. If this is true how could any particle avoid it and in doing so become massless? Diagrams which are devised to show particles interacting with the Higg's field, depict the field as a series of horizontal lines. I submit that these lines are, in fact, equally distributed in time as well as space, meaning that you would encounter precisely the same field lines if you were traveling at relatively low speeds, as you would if you were not traveling at all. This suggests that the Higg's field is akin to some kind of Holographic Time Grating. A particle which is traveling in the time axis only is continuously bumping into this field (which is time itself) causing a zig-zag motion, which slows it down and gives rise to mass.

Stylised diagram showing ordinary space

and Lorentz Contracted space in the same graph.

Now this is all very interesting. But what is even more interesting is how the omnipresent Higg's Field interacts with matter on a 4 dimensional level to create reality, as we know it. For a demonstration of how this happens please watch the video below.

You may have noticed that the interference patterns (which are holographic in nature) are, for the most part, composed of zig-zagging lines; just like our particle trajectories.


What this means is that beyond (or outside of) the Higg's field there exists an expansive holographic interference pattern that is 4D in nature. This interference pattern is the mesh of everything that will exist, everything that has existed and everything that could possibly ever exist. In short, it is God i.e. a self-organising pattern that is timeless and intelligently designed.


But if an omnipotent God exists with a map and a timeline to all of creation, how can free-will be also said to exist? 


Only parts of an object's entire 4-d wave function can be interpreted through the minute, straight-line apertures of the Higg's field grating, at anyone time. These snapshots, or 3D manifolds of the objects exist – played out one after another – but they are not to be thought of as sequential, existing as they do through-out the entire spectrum of the waveform.


This 4D wave that describes all of the possible interactive and internal states is, of course, holographic in nature, and therefore, a fractal. This means that any part of the information of the entire wave function can be accessed at any one time, much like a computer can access files on a hard-drive.  It is by the same application of the above process by which free-will is preserved and restored.

DIRAC SEA PROGRAM

Is the infinite negative charge of the Universe proof of a creator?

One of the surprising revelations made by Dirac in his attempt to unify quantum theory with the relativity was the discovery of the infinite negative charge of the Universe – known as the Dirac Sea. According to modern-day scientific thought, infinity is not a real number, it is merely a concept. For this reason, Dirac theory should be dismissed by the science as an impossibility. However, due to the applicability of Dirac's equations, and the seemingly 'sound' basis of their argument, it has been accepted as fact.


A solution to this incongruity can be allocated by positing the existence of a creator intelligence. This supernatural entity would have been able to set the negative energy value of the Universe to infinity, in the same way that a computer programmer can set input infinite parameters fields in computer simulations. This is the only solution that allows the Dirac Sea and the consensus view of infinity, as it is perceived today, to peacefully coexist.


One of the main philosophical arguments against the belief in the existence of an omnipotent creator deity who controls the fates of men, comes from Gautama Siddharta (or Buddha of the East). He more-or-less states that an antinomian perspective of God results in a lack of concern for morality, on man's part. This argument is inconsequential to science as many of the emergent views of quantum theory and the many universes theory preclude us from the existence of freewill anyway. Science generally removes God from the equation because it is an 'unnecessary' hypothesis with little or no empirical evidence to back it up.


But, as I have shown, if we continue to insist upon an infinite negative charge in the energy state of the Universe, and the impossibility of infinity existing as an empirical value, then a creator hypothesis suddenly becomes a very necessary hypothesis. As for the issue of whether or not we have free will under quantum mechanical laws I will go some way to address this in further posts. Suffice it to say, for now, that the Buddha was right and free will exists. However, as I have previously pointed out, the facts clearly indicate that an intelligent designer may must also be at the reigns of the Universe.


In order to limit the number of regressive divinities (i.e. who created the creator) we could imagine a neutral charge universe or a Universe it which the only charge is a positive one; negativity therefore being an abstract construct (like infinity) employed to delineate our material existence from that of the creator's world.

THE MATRIX OF LEADERSHIP

Reinstating the Timespace Continuum

Some months ago I was pondering how space and time interacted on a fundamental/local level whilst walking home from the shop. I imagined that the ground was divided into a grid of squares, which had numbers on them. To begin with all of the squares were numbered '1', the next second they were numbered '2' and so on... I thought to myself, if I am moving at one square per second then the relationship between my movement and time is symmetric. If I stand still the numbers on the grid change regardless, and the only difference in me moving is which square I stand on at any given second.

In this image we see a man walking. The first line of our space time matrix shows the local time at 1 second. If the man were standing still we could say that he is moving in a vertical direction, downwards with time. If the man moves one square per second then his progression takes a diagonal route down through the matrix (the coloured line). Therefore in order to counteract the downward motion of time, this person would have to be traveling very fast indeed. This is the basic concept behind Einstein's Theory of Relativity, where all speeds are charcterised by a direction in 4-dimensional space-time. I had never fully understood that statement until I began thinking of time in this manner.

As we can see, the diagram divides up the differing speeds into angles of 45 degrees. Ordinary motion takes place at 45 degree angles to time, and light speed travel takes place at a further 45 degrees, making a total of 90 degrees. This is what I think Einstein had originally intended for his diagram of space-time, where 90º equals the sum of all possible speeds, there being no room left for any further acceleration. However, in Minkowskian diagrams the speed of light is often characterised by an angle of 45º, for convenience sake. Although this method allows for further areas of acceleration, these are usually discounted by conjectured time-paradoxes.

This diagram endeavors to show how the different speeds correspond to directions in 4D space-time. The top of the central spike being the sum of all possible speeds is depicted as being at 90º to the slower time-based regions. This diagram also bears relation to the Mexican Hat theory, where the physical laws only appear symmetrical when viewed from the top of the graph i.e. the region of most energy.

With the recent discovery of the neutrino particle traveling faster-than-light, we must logically assume that more potentially feasible regions of acceleration exist in the graphs than previously thought. My own musings on this subject lead to the development of instructive matrices utilising the 45º angle for the 'c' axis, not out of mere mathematical convenience but because that is what makes most logical sense.

The numbers in the first column show the flow rate of time, as observed by an individual (known as A) at rest, where as the diagonal line - consisting entirely of 1s - shows the amount of time experienced by an individual (known as B) traveling at the speed of light. As we can see, if B travels along the diagonal line for 3 seconds and then drops out of light speed, time resumes its normal vertical (downward) tracking. B is now on a different column to A, which expresses the fact that he has moved in space. However, both are on the same row, and indeed can never be on separate rows, because only the present moment exists. Comparing A's clock with B's clock will show a difference of 3 seconds, but the number above and to the right will show the universal time, as marked by all objects in space.

When I speak of 'universal time', I do not refer to the Newtonian concept of absolute time, which is demonstrably false, but rather to the shared commonality of what is known as 'the present' with respect to all reference frames; both of scale and acceleration. While the concept of what constitutes the present may expand i.e. dilate, at speeds approaching that of light, the free-scale nature of space-time  prevents this scaled-expansion from being in anyway important to its over-all conception of what constitutes the present.

Einstein's Theory of Relativity states that because the laws of physics are the same (therefore constant) in all reference frames, the point of view of one reference frame is as good as another. So if time has appeared to stop in one reference frame, then this means that time has indeed stopped across the entire spectrum of space and time, based solely on this one reference frame's point of view. This I feel is a grievous error, because as the above matrix shows time is implicit in all motion. If time stops we can still ask how long it stopped for.

In contrast, relativists have always assumed that due to the constancy of physical laws in all reference frames that the space-time continuum must be disconnected and broken up into individual non-relatable fragments. This is to forget that space and time are fundamentally related, that they are a continuum, and that movement in one represents duration in another.

Interestingly, this very matrix appears in a table by 15th Century mathematician and polymath Sir John Dee. Dee claimed to use the table to communicate with angels. Metatron is the leader of the angels, and is also the name of a potent device in the Transformers series; the Metatron Cube. Another device of importance in this series is the Matrix of Leadership. Therefore, being a child of the 80's and a spirited fan of science fiction, I dub the above matrix, the Matrix of Leadership.

The Lorentz Transformers