DIRAC SEA PROGRAM

Is the infinite negative charge of the Universe proof of a creator?

One of the surprising revelations made by Dirac in his attempt to unify quantum theory with the relativity was the discovery of the infinite negative charge of the Universe – known as the Dirac Sea. According to modern-day scientific thought, infinity is not a real number, it is merely a concept. For this reason, Dirac theory should be dismissed by the science as an impossibility. However, due to the applicability of Dirac's equations, and the seemingly 'sound' basis of their argument, it has been accepted as fact.


A solution to this incongruity can be allocated by positing the existence of a creator intelligence. This supernatural entity would have been able to set the negative energy value of the Universe to infinity, in the same way that a computer programmer can set input infinite parameters fields in computer simulations. This is the only solution that allows the Dirac Sea and the consensus view of infinity, as it is perceived today, to peacefully coexist.


One of the main philosophical arguments against the belief in the existence of an omnipotent creator deity who controls the fates of men, comes from Gautama Siddharta (or Buddha of the East). He more-or-less states that an antinomian perspective of God results in a lack of concern for morality, on man's part. This argument is inconsequential to science as many of the emergent views of quantum theory and the many universes theory preclude us from the existence of freewill anyway. Science generally removes God from the equation because it is an 'unnecessary' hypothesis with little or no empirical evidence to back it up.


But, as I have shown, if we continue to insist upon an infinite negative charge in the energy state of the Universe, and the impossibility of infinity existing as an empirical value, then a creator hypothesis suddenly becomes a very necessary hypothesis. As for the issue of whether or not we have free will under quantum mechanical laws I will go some way to address this in further posts. Suffice it to say, for now, that the Buddha was right and free will exists. However, as I have previously pointed out, the facts clearly indicate that an intelligent designer may must also be at the reigns of the Universe.


In order to limit the number of regressive divinities (i.e. who created the creator) we could imagine a neutral charge universe or a Universe it which the only charge is a positive one; negativity therefore being an abstract construct (like infinity) employed to delineate our material existence from that of the creator's world.